PAC · Illinois · FEC C00580068
Progressive Turnout Project
Progressive Turnout Project is a pac based in Illinois. In the 2026 cycle it has raised $47.3M, spent $42.7M, $382K of it as independent expenditures through August 31, 2026, according to its FEC filings.
Source: FEC committee record C00580068. Data pulled October 19, 2026; independent expenditure lines include 24 and 48 hour notices. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for Progressive Turnout Project.
2026 cycle at a glance
Independent expenditure lines by direction, 2026 cycle to date.
- FEC committee type
- Hybrid PAC (with Non-Contribution Account) - Qualified
- Designation
- Unauthorized
- Party affiliation on file
- None listed
- State
- Illinois
- First Form 1 filed
- June 26, 2015
- Contributions to federal candidates
- $1,148,000
Candidates Progressive Turnout Project has spent on in 2026
Independent expenditures from Schedule E, 45 candidates in 45 races, largest first. Amounts reported by the committee; not a measure of effect.
Supporting
| Candidate | Race | Total | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D) | Florida's 25th District | $243,524 | Oct 12 |
| Christina Bohannan (D) | Iowa's 1st District | $105,525 | Oct 12 |
| Rep. Don Davis (D) | North Carolina's 1st District | $125,675 | Oct 15 |
| Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D) | Ohio's 9th District | $111,039 | Oct 15 |
| Rep. Shomari Figures (D) | Alabama's 2nd District | $67,647 | Oct 12 |
| Amish Shah (D) | Arizona's 1st District | $325,750 | Oct 12 |
| Jonathan Nez (D) | Arizona's 2nd District | $100,541 | Oct 12 |
| Janelle Stelson (D) | Pennsylvania's 10th District | $71,223 | Oct 15 |
| Rebecca Cooke (D) | Wisconsin's 3rd District | $220,790 | Oct 15 |
| Joanna Mendoza (D) | Arizona's 6th District | $213,133 | Oct 12 |
| Rep. Darren Soto (D) | Florida's 9th District | $211,866 | Oct 12 |
| Rep. Kathy Castor (D) | Florida's 14th District | $253,299 | Oct 12 |
| Leela Gray (D) | Florida's 13th District | $45,823 | Oct 12 |
| Pia Dandiya (D) | Florida's 22nd District | $204,554 | Oct 12 |
| Lindsay James (D) | Iowa's 2nd District | $76,465 | Oct 12 |
| Sarah Trone Garriott (D) | Iowa's 3rd District | $67,813 | Oct 12 |
| Zach Dembo (D) | Kentucky's 6th District | $62,906 | Oct 12 |
| Matt Dunlap (D) | Maine's 2nd District | $14,535 | Sep 20 |
| Sean McCann (D) | Michigan's 4th District | $60,822 | Oct 12 |
| William Lawrence (D) | Michigan's 7th District | $37,795 | Oct 12 |
| Christina Hines (D) | Michigan's 10th District | $137,387 | Oct 12 |
| Jacob Johnson (D) | Minnesota's 1st District | $115,914 | Oct 15 |
| Samuel Forstag (D) | Montana's 1st District | $361,971 | Oct 15 |
| Jamie Ager (D) | North Carolina's 11th District | $83,971 | Oct 15 |
| Denise Powell (D) | Nebraska's 2nd District | $110,002 | Oct 15 |
Every row links the candidate's state page. For where this money sits against the rest of the cycle, see the PAC spend tracker.
What voter contact for Progressive Turnout Project's slate would cost
Enter the number of candidates the committee supports and the voters each program should reach. The bundle is priced on the combined list, every candidate is itemized, and each row ends with the in-kind line for that candidate.
Add 3,251 more households (about 4,712 voters, one more race or a deeper universe) and the whole bundle drops to $0.26 per household.
Per-candidate rate and in-kind line for Progressive Turnout Project's slate
| Candidate | Households | Alone | In bundle | Candidate program |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate 1 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 2 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 3 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 4 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 5 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
Show the in-kind contribution line for each candidate
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 1: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 2: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 3: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 4: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 5: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
The value is what the committee pays for that candidate's program at the bundle rate. Whether it is reported as an in-kind contribution or an independent expenditure depends on coordination; confirm with counsel.
For PACs and party committees
Five things a committee gets from The Political Group that a single campaign cannot
- 1. Bundling
Bundle your candidates with us and unlock a volume breakpoint no single campaign reaches alone. The whole slate is priced on its combined list, and every race in it pays that rate.
- 2. Control
You pay directly toward voter persuasion you can track yourself, dollar by dollar, and report the in-kind contribution to each candidate cleanly. Every program is itemized per candidate from the first quote.
- 3. The live dashboard
Every bundled candidate gets a live campaign dashboard showing dials, conversations, voter identification and daily momentum as they happen. Not a weekly PDF. Unmatched anywhere.
- 4. The support tracker
Across all your candidates: who is gaining, who is slipping, who needs help. Spend more where it matters and less where it does not, while there is still time to move money.
- 5. HyperPulse
AI polling that reads the voters of any district in hours for a fraction of a traditional poll, and gets sharper as real voter contact calibrates it. With us you can sample real voters.
Progressive Turnout Project: questions
What is Progressive Turnout Project?+
Progressive Turnout Project is a pac based in Illinois. In the 2026 cycle it has raised $47.3M, spent $42.7M, $382K of it as independent expenditures through August 31, 2026, according to its FEC filings. Its FEC committee ID is C00580068 and its first Statement of Organization (Form 1) was filed June 26, 2015.
How much has Progressive Turnout Project raised and spent in the 2026 cycle?+
Progressive Turnout Project reports $47,324,540 in receipts and $42,715,997 in disbursements through August 31, 2026, with $18,090,330 cash on hand at the end of its latest report. Figures are the FEC's processed totals and lag the newest filings by days to weeks.
Which candidates has Progressive Turnout Project spent for or against?+
In the 2026 cycle Progressive Turnout Project has reported $381,980 in independent expenditures touching 45 candidates across 45 races. The candidate table on this page lists every support and oppose total from Schedule E filings, including 24 and 48 hour notices.
How can Progressive Turnout Project run voter contact for several candidates at once?+
A committee that buys live phone banking for a slate through The Political Group is priced on the whole bundle's household count, so every race pays the volume rate, and each candidate's program is itemized separately for in-kind reporting. Every candidate gets a live dashboard and the committee gets a roll-up view of who is gaining and who is slipping. The bundle calculator on this page prices a slate in seconds.