PAC · Massachusetts · FEC C00693838
More Jobs, Less Government
More Jobs, Less Government is a pac based in Massachusetts. In the 2026 cycle it has raised $3.5M, spent $3.7M, $2.9M of it as independent expenditures through July 29, 2026, according to its FEC filings.
Source: FEC committee record C00693838. Data pulled September 10, 2026; independent expenditure lines include 24 and 48 hour notices. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for More Jobs, Less Government.
2026 cycle at a glance
Independent expenditure lines by direction, 2026 cycle to date.
- FEC committee type
- Hybrid PAC (with Non-Contribution Account) - Qualified
- Designation
- Unauthorized
- Party affiliation on file
- None listed
- State
- Massachusetts
- First Form 1 filed
- January 14, 2019
- Contributions to federal candidates
- $119,300
Candidates More Jobs, Less Government has spent on in 2026
Independent expenditures from Schedule E, 4 candidates in 1 race, largest first. Amounts reported by the committee; not a measure of effect.
Supporting
| Candidate | Race | Total | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alani Bankhead (D) | U.S. Senate, Montana | $901,179 | May 28 |
| Kurt Alme (R) | U.S. Senate, Montana | $40,110 | May 26 |
Opposing
| Candidate | Race | Total | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reilly Neill (D) | U.S. Senate, Montana | $1,062,636 | May 28 |
| Alani Bankhead (D) | U.S. Senate, Montana | $6,816 | May 26 |
| Seth Bodnar (I) | U.S. Senate, Montana | $962,124 | Jul 22 |
Every row links the candidate's state page. For where this money sits against the rest of the cycle, see the PAC spend tracker.
What voter contact for More Jobs, Less Government's slate would cost
Enter the number of candidates the committee supports and the voters each program should reach. The bundle is priced on the combined list, every candidate is itemized, and each row ends with the in-kind line for that candidate.
Add 3,251 more households (about 4,712 voters, one more race or a deeper universe) and the whole bundle drops to $0.26 per household.
Per-candidate rate and in-kind line for More Jobs, Less Government's slate
| Candidate | Households | Alone | In bundle | Candidate program |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate 1 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 2 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 3 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 4 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
| Candidate 5 | 10,350 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $2,817 |
Show the in-kind contribution line for each candidate
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 1: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 2: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 3: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 4: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
- In-kind contribution to Candidate 5: live voter contact phone program, 10,350 voter households, three attempts each, valued at $2,817.27.
The value is what the committee pays for that candidate's program at the bundle rate. Whether it is reported as an in-kind contribution or an independent expenditure depends on coordination; confirm with counsel.
For PACs and party committees
Five things a committee gets from The Political Group that a single campaign cannot
- 1. Bundling
Bundle your candidates with us and unlock a volume breakpoint no single campaign reaches alone. The whole slate is priced on its combined list, and every race in it pays that rate.
- 2. Control
You pay directly toward voter persuasion you can track yourself, dollar by dollar, and report the in-kind contribution to each candidate cleanly. Every program is itemized per candidate from the first quote.
- 3. The live dashboard
Every bundled candidate gets a live campaign dashboard showing dials, conversations, voter identification and daily momentum as they happen. Not a weekly PDF. Unmatched anywhere.
- 4. The support tracker
Across all your candidates: who is gaining, who is slipping, who needs help. Spend more where it matters and less where it does not, while there is still time to move money.
- 5. HyperPulse
AI polling that reads the voters of any district in hours for a fraction of a traditional poll, and gets sharper as real voter contact calibrates it. With us you can sample real voters.
More Jobs, Less Government: questions
What is More Jobs, Less Government?+
More Jobs, Less Government is a pac based in Massachusetts. In the 2026 cycle it has raised $3.5M, spent $3.7M, $2.9M of it as independent expenditures through July 29, 2026, according to its FEC filings. Its FEC committee ID is C00693838 and its first Statement of Organization (Form 1) was filed January 14, 2019.
How much has More Jobs, Less Government raised and spent in the 2026 cycle?+
More Jobs, Less Government reports $3,520,579 in receipts and $3,726,646 in disbursements through July 29, 2026, with $344,820 cash on hand at the end of its latest report. Figures are the FEC's processed totals and lag the newest filings by days to weeks.
Which candidates has More Jobs, Less Government spent for or against?+
In the 2026 cycle More Jobs, Less Government has reported $2,869,180 in independent expenditures touching 4 candidates across 1 race. The candidate table on this page lists every support and oppose total from Schedule E filings, including 24 and 48 hour notices.
How can More Jobs, Less Government run voter contact for several candidates at once?+
A committee that buys live phone banking for a slate through The Political Group is priced on the whole bundle's household count, so every race pays the volume rate, and each candidate's program is itemized separately for in-kind reporting. Every candidate gets a live dashboard and the committee gets a roll-up view of who is gaining and who is slipping. The bundle calculator on this page prices a slate in seconds.