District of Columbia · verified October 5, 2026
District of Columbia AI laws for political campaigns
The District of Columbia has no law on AI or deepfakes in political ads or calls; the Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act (B26-0329), which would require AI disclaimers and ban undisclosed or knowing deepfakes within 90 days of an election, has sat in committee since 2025.
- Political ad AI law
- No law
- When it applies
- No state rule
- Required AI disclaimer
- None required
- Criminal penalty
- No state rule
- Candidate can sue
- General law only
- AI voice calls
- Federal TCPA only
Political ads and deepfakes
Does District of Columbia regulate AI in political ads?
No. As of October 5, 2026, District of Columbia has no state law that specifically regulates artificial intelligence or deepfakes in political ads or election communications. D.C. has not enacted any rule on AI-generated or synthetic media in political communications. Councilmember Allen's 2024 Deepfake Political Advertising Regulation Amendment Act (B25-0832) died at the end of Council Period 25. His 2025 Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act (B26-0329) would add AI disclaimers for images, audio, and video, bar distributing known artificial media within 90 days of an election, allow injunctions, and set Campaign Finance Board fines up to $10,000 (first offense) and $20,000 (repeat), but it has had no hearing and is still under Council review. Bills not passed by December 31, 2026 expire with Council Period 26.
Bills to watch
- B26-0329 (2025): Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act of 2025 (adds a new section 315a on political advertising using artificial media). Under Council review. Introduced 2025-07-14 by Councilmember Allen (co-introducers Nadeau, Henderson, Lewis George); referred to the Committee on Executive Administration and Labor 2025-09-17; no hearing or markup recorded.
- B25-0832 (2024): Deepfake Political Advertising Regulation Amendment Act of 2024. Failed. Introduced 2024-06-05 and referred to committee; expired at the end of Council Period 25 (December 2024).
For campaigns and consultants
Before an AI ad runs in District of Columbia
- No D.C. AI disclaimer is required today; follow the District's standard paid-for-by rules on all campaign material.
- If B26-0329 advances, expect exact disclaimers such as "This audio has been altered or modified through the use of artificial intelligence or other digital technology to display a sound or voice that did not occur." read at the start and end of audio.
- Avoid AI likenesses of opponents near an election; the pending bill would bar known artificial media within 90 days regardless of labels.
- Federal TCPA rules on AI and prerecorded voices apply to calls into D.C.
AI voice calls and texts
Can a campaign use AI voice calls in District of Columbia?
D.C. has no statute specific to AI voices or political robocalls. The pending B26-0329 would require a spoken AI disclaimer at the beginning and end of altered campaign audio (and every two minutes if longer) and bar known artificial media within 90 days of an election, but it is not law. Federal TCPA rules, including the FCC's 2024 ruling that AI-generated voices are artificial voices, govern calls into the District.
Federal floor everywhere: AI-generated voices are “artificial” voices under the TCPA (FCC, February 2024), so they need prior express consent to cell phones and must identify the caller at the start of the call. AI robocall laws in every state
Federal layer
Federal rules that apply in District of Columbia
At the federal level, the binding rules that hit AI in campaigns today are the TCPA and FCC robocall rules, not any AI-specific election law. Since February 2024 the FCC treats AI-generated voices as "artificial" voices, so AI voice calls to cell phones need prior express consent (political calls included), AI or prerecorded political calls to landlines are limited to three per 30 days without consent, and every such message must identify the caller, give a callback number and offer an opt-out. The FEC says its existing fraudulent misrepresentation ban covers AI, but it has had no quorum since April 2025 and cannot enforce. Proposed FCC rules on AI disclosure in broadcast political ads and in AI calls were never adopted, and no federal AI political ad disclaimer bill has passed. Federal efforts to preempt state AI laws (a 2025 moratorium the Senate struck 99 to 1, and Executive Order 14365) have not displaced any state election or robocall law as of October 2026.
How District of Columbia compares
19 other jurisdictions share District of Columbia's status (no law):
Alaska · Arkansas · Connecticut · Georgia · Illinois · Iowa · Kansas · Massachusetts · Missouri · Nebraska · New Jersey · North Carolina · Ohio · Oklahoma · Pennsylvania · South Carolina · Virginia · West Virginia · Wyoming
See District of Columbia on the mapPolitical deepfake laws, all statesDisclaimer generator
HyperPhonebank
Voter contact that clears District of Columbia's AI rules before the first dial.
Live professional callers and AI voice programs for voter ID, persuasion, ballot chase and GOTV, scripted to the disclosure and consent rules on this page, with every call graded and a real time dashboard.
Frequently asked questions
Does District of Columbia regulate AI in political ads?
No. As of October 5, 2026, District of Columbia has no state law that specifically regulates artificial intelligence or deepfakes in political ads or election communications. D.C. has not enacted any rule on AI-generated or synthetic media in political communications. Councilmember Allen's 2024 Deepfake Political Advertising Regulation Amendment Act (B25-0832) died at the end of Council Period 25. His 2025 Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act (B26-0329) would add AI disclaimers for images, audio, and video, bar distributing known artificial media within 90 days of an election, allow injunctions, and set Campaign Finance Board fines up to $10,000 (first offense) and $20,000 (repeat), but it has had no hearing and is still under Council review. Bills not passed by December 31, 2026 expire with Council Period 26.
Can a campaign use an AI voice for robocalls in District of Columbia?
D.C. has no statute specific to AI voices or political robocalls. The pending B26-0329 would require a spoken AI disclaimer at the beginning and end of altered campaign audio (and every two minutes if longer) and bar known artificial media within 90 days of an election, but it is not law. Federal TCPA rules, including the FCC's 2024 ruling that AI-generated voices are artificial voices, govern calls into the District. Under federal law, the FCC ruled in February 2024 that AI-generated voices are "artificial" voices under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, so prerecorded or AI voice calls to cell phones need prior express consent, and every such call must identify the caller at the start.
How many political AI laws does District of Columbia have?
This tracker counts 0 District of Columbia AI laws touching politics and elections as of October 5, 2026: none in any category.
Are there pending AI election bills in District of Columbia?
B26-0329 (2025) (Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act of 2025 (adds a new section 315a on political advertising using artificial media)): Under Council review. Introduced 2025-07-14 by Councilmember Allen (co-introducers Nadeau, Henderson, Lewis George); referred to the Committee on Executive Administration and Labor 2025-09-17; no hearing or markup recorded. B25-0832 (2024) (Deepfake Political Advertising Regulation Amendment Act of 2024): Failed. Introduced 2024-06-05 and referred to committee; expired at the end of Council Period 25 (December 2024).
Sources
- D.C. Council LIMS, B26-0329 Campaign Finance Modernization Amendment Act of 2025
- B26-0329 introduced text (PDF)
- D.C. Council LIMS, B25-0832 Deepfake Political Advertising Regulation Amendment Act of 2024
- Public Citizen, Tracker: State Legislation on Deepfakes in Elections
Verified October 5, 2026 against official legislature and statute pages. This page summarizes District of Columbia law for campaigns and is not legal advice.