Will the CLARITY Act crypto market structure bill become law in 2026?

We now put the chance the CLARITY Act becomes law by December 31, 2026 at 7 percent, up 1 point after tightening our reference class, as of our October 12 cutoff. The Senate's September 15 vote was effectively 50 to 49 once a procedural switch is counted, still 10 short of 60, and no ethics deal has surfaced.

Evidence cutoff Version 2 of 2By the TPG Forecast Desk, edited by Frank Carrasco, PhD#9602762990

Why it matters: The CLARITY Act would write the first federal rulebook for crypto trading platforms, tokens and developers, affecting the roughly one in 11 U.S. adults who own crypto and every exchange that serves them.

TPG forecast

7%

Remote

Very unlikely before the new Congress

Our odds over timeTPG forecastMarket
0%25%50%75%100%Resolves Dec 31, 2026Sep 26, 2026

Version 2: 7% (range 3% to 13%) · Kalshi 8%

Evidence cutoff Oct 12, 2026 · published Oct 12, 2026 · Very unlikely before the new Congress

The numbers behind the call

49-50

Senate vote on September 15 that failed to start debate; one no was a procedural switch to allow reconsideration[1]

11

votes short of 60 on the recorded tally (10 counting the procedural switch)[6]

294-134

House vote passing the CLARITY Act in July 2025[2]

More than 600

pages of negotiated compromise that still failed[3]

9%

of U.S. adults who say they own crypto[4]

More than $200 million

spent by crypto-backed political groups in the 2024 cycle[5]

What it means for you

Crypto investors

About 9 percent of U.S. adults own crypto. Without a law, their protections rest on SEC and CFTC guidance and rules that a future administration can reverse, as the SEC chair himself has acknowledged.

Exchanges and crypto companies

Platforms would get a registration path and a clear line between SEC and CFTC jurisdiction. Without it they keep operating under agency rulemaking such as the SEC's proposed Regulation Crypto Assets.

Software developers

The bill's decentralized finance section addresses whether people who write non-custodial code can be treated as money transmitters, one of the provisions that divided senators.

Stablecoin users and banks

The bill's limits on stablecoin yield and rewards pit banks against crypto firms; failure leaves the 2025 GENIUS Act stablecoin law as the only statute on the books.

Voters and ethics watchers

Ethics provisions aimed at senior officials holding crypto business ties, including the President's family ventures, were a central sticking point, so the outcome also sets precedent on conflict-of-interest rules.

The read

Three lenses, always in this order. How the method works.

01

Psychology

What do the decision makers need?

The sponsors, Tim Scott, John Boozman and Cynthia Lummis, forced a vote on a 'last, best and final' draft released two days earlier. Pushing a vote you expect to lose is often about assigning blame before an election rather than passing a law. Lummis warned colleagues not to hand the future to someone else, which is the language of a closing argument, not of a deal about to close.

The hardest issue is one no negotiator can trade away: ethics language aimed at senior officials' crypto businesses, which reaches the President's family ventures. Democrats cannot be seen voting for a bill without it, and the White House cannot be seen accepting limits aimed at the President. Once the House changes hands, as many in the industry expect, Democrats also gain from waiting: they would have a say over any bill in 2027, while their Senate Banking leader could be a longtime crypto skeptic.

02

History

What happened the last times this came up?

Reference class: high-profile bills whose Senate cloture effort failed before the election in the final months of a Congress and that then faced a lame-duck revival attempt. Our list: Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal (2010, enacted December 22, 2010), the DREAM Act (2010, failed again in December), the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 (failed again in November) and the 2024 child tax credit and business tax bill (blocked in August, not revived). That is 1 success in 4, or 25 percent. In version 1 we also counted the Paycheck Fairness Act (2010), Keystone XL approval (2014) and the USA FREEDOM Act (2014), but their cloture failures came in the lame duck itself, so they are not revivals of a pre-election failure and we have dropped them.

Closest analogue: Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal, the lone success. Where it breaks: repeal had majority support at every step and was split into a clean standalone bill that could draw a handful of Republicans. CLARITY's recorded tally was 49 to 50, though Sen. Thom Tillis switched to no only to keep the right to move to reconsider, so its real support was 50, still 10 short of 60. Three Republicans voted no on the merits, and its core dispute (ethics tied to the sitting President) cannot be split off without losing Democrats. The GENIUS Act, the 2025 stablecoin law, is the best counterexample: its first cloture vote failed, and it still became law after quick changes. But that recovery came in the spring of an off year, not in the last weeks of a Congress.

03

Statistics

Base rate, adjustments, the number.

Start from the revival base rate of 25 percent (1 of 4, after dropping the three bills whose cloture failure came in the lame duck itself).

Subtract 8 points because CLARITY needs 10 more senators, while the successful analogue needed only a handful, and because its dispute cannot be severed into a cleaner bill. Subtract 6 points because even a Senate win is not enough: the House must then pass the Senate's 600-plus-page text in the same few December weeks, when appropriations, the defense bill and a possible war funding package compete for floor time.

Add 2 points for the GENIUS Act precedent: the 2025 stablecoin bill lost its first cloture vote 48 to 49 and passed 11 days later once Democrats won changes, so a failed first vote on crypto legislation is not always final. Subtract 6 points for the record since the vote: no second cloture vote scheduled, no named Democrat moving to yes, and industry attention shifting to SEC and CFTC rulemaking.

25 minus 8 minus 6 plus 2 minus 6 lands at 7 percent, band 3 to 13 percent (our calculation). In version 1 we started from 14 percent on a looser class and subtracted 6 points for falling short of a simple majority, which overstated a procedural artifact; correcting both moves us from 6 to 7. Kalshi priced 'Before Jan 1, 2027' at about 8 cents on September 26, so we are now within a point of the last market price we could confirm.

Between the lines

What people spent versus what they said, and what was left out.

What was left out

After the failed vote, sponsors and supporters, including Sen. Thom Tillis, said the bill was not finished, but no one announced new Democratic supporters or a revised ethics text before Congress left to campaign.

Statements that a bill is still alive cost nothing. The missing piece is the one that matters: named senators willing to switch. Until that appears, the motion to reconsider is an option, not a plan.

Cheap talk

Sen. Thom Tillis switched his vote to no at the end of the roll call so he could file a motion to reconsider, keeping the bill technically alive.

This is a procedural option that costs nothing. It preserves a second vote but says nothing about new supporters. A real revival signal would be a named Democrat committing to yes.

Costly signal

Republicans Jerry Moran, Susan Collins and Josh Hawley voted no alongside every Democrat.

Collins is in a competitive reelection, and all three have records of breaking with party leaders. Their no votes show the ethics and consumer issues cut across party lines, so the problem is not just Democratic leverage. Leadership cannot fix it with pressure on Democrats alone.

Sequencing

The final substitute with 126 changes requested by Democrats was released late September 13 and put to a vote September 15.

A 48-hour turnaround on a text of this size left no room for Democrats to say yes. Forcing the vote anyway suggests leaders wanted a recorded outcome before the midterms more than they wanted a law this year.

History vs the market vs our call
0%25%50%75%100%History: 1 of 4 25% (95% CI 1% to 81%)Kalshi 8%TPG forecast 7%

Our number after adjusting the base rate for what is different this time: 7%. It sits inside the historical interval.

Check our statistics yourself

Reference class
1 of 4 (25%)
Exact 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson)
0.6 to 80.6%
Bayesian 95% credible (uniform prior)
5.3 to 71.6%
Binomial test of our 7%
p = 0.252

Our 7% sits inside the historical interval: the forecast is consistent with how cases like this have gone.

Reproduce in JASP (free, jasp-stats.org)
  1. Download base-rate.csv (one row per case in the reference class, outcome 1 or 0) and open it in JASP.
  2. Frequencies, then Binomial Test. Variable: outcome. Test value: 0.07. Tick Confidence interval. JASP reports the same p value and Clopper-Pearson interval shown here.
  3. Frequencies, then Bayesian Binomial Test, with a Beta(1, 1) prior. The posterior 95% credible interval matches ours.

Reference class: TPG list of lame-duck revival attempts after a pre-election failed Senate cloture effort: Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal 2010 (enacted), DREAM Act 2010, Cybersecurity Act of 2012 and the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act 2024 (not enacted in that Congress). Bills whose cloture failure came only in the lame duck (Paycheck Fairness Act 2010, Keystone XL 2014, USA FREEDOM Act 2014) are excluded. The one success is documented in the linked record.

Base rate

25%

of high-profile bills blocked in Senate cloture before a midterm or presidential election were enacted in the following lame duck (1 of 4)[7]

TPG list of lame-duck revival attempts after a pre-election failed Senate cloture effort: Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal 2010 (enacted), DREAM Act 2010, Cybersecurity Act of 2012 and the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act 2024 (not enacted in that Congress). Bills whose cloture failure came only in the lame duck (Paycheck Fairness Act 2010, Keystone XL 2014, USA FREEDOM Act 2014) are excluded. The one success is documented in the linked record. (n = 4)

Closest historical parallels

  • Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal (2010)

    Alike: Blocked in the Senate in the fall of a midterm year, revived in the lame duck.

    Outcome: Standalone bill passed the Senate December 18 and was signed December 22, 2010.

    Where it breaks: It had majority support throughout and a clean, severable policy. CLARITY lost 49 to 50 and its sticking point cannot be severed.

  • GENIUS Act stablecoin law (2025)

    Alike: Crypto legislation in the same Congress whose first Senate cloture vote failed 48 to 49 in May 2025.

    Outcome: Passed cloture 11 days later after Democrats won changes, then passed the Senate 68 to 30 and became law in July 2025.

    Where it breaks: That turnaround happened with months left in the session and no election looming, and enough Democrats accepted it without ethics limits on the President. On CLARITY, three Republicans also defected and the House would have to act again in a short lame duck.

  • Cybersecurity Act of 2012 (2012)

    Alike: Complex, industry-backed regulatory bill that failed cloture in the summer of an election year with a promise to return after the election.

    Outcome: Failed again in the November lame duck; pieces moved later in other vehicles.

    Where it breaks: It lacked a presidential conflict-of-interest dimension, which makes CLARITY's revival even harder.

How it could play out

Every path we see, sized by probability. Paths that resolve YES add up to our 7%.

  • No further action; bill dies with the 119th Congress No88%

    Default path as the industry shifts to SEC and CFTC rulemaking and waits for the next Congress.

  • Lame-duck ethics deal, cloture reconsidered and won, House clears Senate text, signed Yes6%

    A named group of 10 or more Democrats announces support after a revised ethics section.

  • Senate passes in December but the House does not finish by December 31 No5%

    Late Senate action collides with the end of the session.

  • Market structure text attached to a year-end must-pass package Yes1%

    Leaders fold a slimmed version into an omnibus or defense bill.

What would change our number

↑

Thune schedules a second cloture vote for the lame duck

+5 points
↑

Ruben Gallego and other Democrats announce a revised ethics agreement with the White House's acceptance

+10 points
↓

Democrats win the House on November 3

-2 points
↓

Sponsors say publicly they will reintroduce in 2027

to 1 or 2 percent

TPG 7% vs Kalshi 8%

Kalshi's 'Will the Clarity Act become law? Before Jan 1, 2027' traded between 7.5 and 8 cents on September 26. At 7 percent we are within a point. A law needs both a Senate reversal and House passage inside a crowded lame duck, and nothing public has moved since the vote. At our October 12 cutoff we could not open a current Kalshi quote, so this block still shows the September 26 price; read it as dated.

Market price recorded September 26, 2026 from Kalshi. Analysis, not investment advice.

How this question resolves

Resolves YES if, by 11:59 p.m. Eastern on December 31, 2026, the President signs into law (or Congress enacts over a veto) the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) or any successor bill that establishes a federal market structure framework for digital assets dividing oversight between the SEC and the CFTC, whether standalone or inside a larger package. Resolves NO otherwise.

Closes: December 31, 2026. Judged by: Congress.gov bill status and White House signing announcements

Questions people ask

Will the CLARITY Act pass in 2026?

+

Very unlikely. TPG puts the chance the CLARITY Act becomes law by December 31, 2026 at 6 percent. On September 15, 2026 the Senate voted 49 to 50 on starting debate, 11 votes short of the 60 needed. A motion to reconsider keeps it technically alive, but no new vote is scheduled and the ethics dispute is unresolved.

Why did the CLARITY Act fail in the Senate?

+

The Senate's September 15, 2026 cloture vote failed 49 to 50. Every Democrat and three Republicans voted no. The main unresolved issues were ethics rules for senior officials with crypto businesses, including the President's family ventures, liability for decentralized finance developers, and limits on stablecoin yield.

What happens to crypto regulation if the CLARITY Act fails?

+

Regulation shifts to the agencies. The SEC has proposed Regulation Crypto Assets and the CFTC is advancing its own rules. Those can be reversed by a future administration, which is why the industry wanted a statute. The 2025 GENIUS Act remains the one federal crypto law, covering stablecoins.

Did the House pass the CLARITY Act?

+

Yes. The House passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, H.R. 3633, on July 17, 2025 by 294 to 134, with 78 Democrats voting yes. The Senate Banking Committee approved its version 15 to 9 in May 2026, but the full Senate has not been able to begin debate.

Sources

Every source is dated on or before the October 12, 2026 evidence cutoff. Nothing published later was used.

  1. [1]Crypto Clarity Act flames out in failed U.S. Senate vote. CoinDesk, Sep 15, 2026.

    “a 49-50 vote meant to start the bill toward passage fell far short in rounding up the 60 supporters required to advance”

  2. [2]U.S. House of Representatives pass CLARITY Act with bipartisan support. Office of Rep. Don Davis, Jul 17, 2025.

    “also known as the CLARITY Act, by a bipartisan vote of 294-134”

  3. [3]Crypto Clarity Act flames out in failed U.S. Senate vote. CoinDesk, Sep 15, 2026.

    “Negotiators for the two political parties had hashed out more than 600 pages of legislative compromise”

  4. [4]U.S. Crypto Ownership Falls From 2025 High. Gallup, Sep 21, 2026.

    “9% now report owning cryptocurrency, down from 14% in Gallup's initial reading of this group last year”

  5. [5]Crypto enters September with legislative policy gamble hanging by a thread. CNBC, Sep 1, 2026.

    “Crypto-backed political groups spent more than $200 million”

  6. [6]CLARITY Act Fails 49-50 in US Senate as SEC & CFTC Move Ahead on Crypto Rules Within 48 Hours. The Crypto Times, Sep 20, 2026.

    “The tally was 11 votes short of the 60-vote three-fifths threshold and one short of a simple majority.”

  7. [7]Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010. Wikipedia, Sep 26, 2026.

    “President Barack Obama signed the bill into law on December 22, 2010”

  8. [8]CLARITY Act fails Senate vote, crypto blame game begins. CoinGeek, Sep 16, 2026.

    “Jerry Moran of Kansas, Maine's Susan Collins, and Missouri's Josh Hawley”

Version history and integrity

Published forecasts are never edited. When the evidence changes we publish a new version beside the old one, each locked with a sha256 hash of its full contents. When this question resolves it is scored in public on our track record.

VersionCutoffForecastLock hash
v2Oct 12, 20267% Remote9602762990424fbbd0a6a2c119c9402eda880dfded34c28e9a867cc5aff28173
v1Sep 26, 20266% Remote423fccd0d1cdb67bfaa17c53efa98c79449599c736068564caac6bf18368f876

Download every forecast: JSON or CSV (CC BY 4.0). Public sources only. Analysis, not investment or legal advice.