- Citation
- KRS 117.322 (definitions in KRS 117.001)
- Enacted
- March 24, 2025
- Effective
- March 24, 2025
- When it applies
- within 45 days before a primary or regular election
- Media covered
- audio or video recordings of an identifiable real person intentionally manipulated with generative adversarial network (machine learning) techniques to create a realistic but false depiction, made without the person's consent, that gives a fundamentally different impression than the original. Still images are not covered.
- Who it covers
- the sponsor (the person or entity paying for the communication; if an agent is reimbursed, the original source of funds). Broadcast and media outlets and their ad sales reps are not liable unless they intentionally remove a disclosure and do not fix it when notified, or alter content so it becomes synthetic media. Interactive computer services keep Section 230 protection.
- Rule
- disclosure required
- Intent required
- No intent element for the sponsor; the manipulation itself must be intentional. The plaintiff must prove use of synthetic media by clear and convincing evidence.
- Disclaimer format
- A disclosure that is clear and conspicuous and included in, or alongside and associated with, the content in a manner that is likely to be noticed by the user. No set wording, size, or duration.
- Exemptions
- news articles, editorials, opinion, commentary, and letters in periodicals not owned or controlled by a candidate, committee, or party
- bona fide newscasts, news interviews, documentaries, and on-the-spot news coverage by stations not owned or controlled by a candidate, committee, or party (if they do not strip the sponsor's disclaimer)
- communications in the regular course of business and membership organization communications to members and families
- references to a candidate only in the popular name of a bill or statute
- communications that are contributions or independent expenditures under KRS 121.015
- federally licensed broadcasters airing communications subject to 47 U.S.C. 315
- content that already contains the disclosure is not synthetic media
- Criminal penalty
- Failure to comply with a court order to include the disclosure is subject to the penalties in KRS 121.990(3) for violating KRS 121.190(1): a Class D felony for each offense (121.990(3) applies to knowing violations).
- Civil penalty
- Court may award the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and costs; other remedies are preserved.
- Who can sue
- Yes. Any candidate for elected office whose appearance, action, or speech is altered may seek an injunction or other equitable relief against the sponsor, filed in the Circuit Court of the county where the candidate lives. Courts are encouraged to decide quickly.
- Injunction available
- Yes
- Court challenges
- No reported lawsuit under KRS 117.322 was found. AI deepfake attack ads in the May 2026 northern Kentucky Republican primary for U.S. House (Rep. Thomas Massie), which Massie publicly called defamatory, involved a federal race outside the statute's state and local candidate definition.
- Notes
- Enacted inside SB 4, mainly a state government AI governance bill, with an emergency clause citing the need to protect candidates and election officers from fraudulent misrepresentations. Key limits: covers only state, county, city, and district candidates and ballot measures (not federal races), only audio and video (not still images), and only the 45-day window. The definition of electioneering communication excludes communications that are contributions or independent expenditures under KRS 121.015, which may narrow which ads are covered; no court has interpreted this. The definition expressly includes telephone calls to personal residences, so AI voice calls that imitate a candidate are covered. There is no outright prohibition: the remedy is a court order compelling a disclosure, and a clear and conspicuous disclosure is an affirmative defense. Text confirmed against KRS 117.322 (effective 2025-03-24, created 2025 Ky. Acts ch. 66, sec. 5).