Political AI Law Tracker · verified October 5, 2026

AI political ad laws in all 50 states, on one map.

Every state rule on deepfakes in campaign ads, AI voice robocalls, deceptive AI about voting and deepfakes of election officials. Exact disclaimer wording, election windows, penalties and the official source for each law.

As of October 5, 2026, 30 of the 50 states have an enforceable law on AI-generated deepfakes in political ads and election communications. 4 prohibit some deceptive AI media of candidates outright, 26 allow it only with a disclaimer, 1 has a law blocked in court, and 19 have no election AI law (Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming). The District of Columbia has no law. Federal law adds one rule for everyone: AI voices count as artificial voices under the TCPA.

3 Prohibition1 Prohibition + disclosure26 Disclosure1 Blocked in court19 No law
30
states regulate AI in political ads
19
have no election AI law
125
political AI laws tracked
37
states with rules reaching AI voice calls

The map

Political ads first. Switch the lens to see AI voice calls, criminal penalties, which states let candidates sue, exact disclaimer wording, and laws on deceptive AI about voting.

Running an ad with AI?

Get the exact disclaimer for every state it runs in.

Add the states. You get each statute's required wording, size and timing rules, and a warning where a label does not make the ad legal.

Add every state where the ad will air, stream, mail or be posted. A digital ad seen statewide in several states must satisfy each of them.

Bookmark it: AI political ad disclaimer generator

Every state, side by side

Sort by any column. Each state links to its full guide with every law, citation and source.

51 of 51
Political deepfake and AI law status for every state
WindowMedia coveredDisclaimerCriminalCandidate can sue
AlabamaDisclosure
Ala. Code 17-5-16.1
within 90 days before an electionany image, audio, or video produced by artificial intelligence that falsely depicts an individual engaging in speech or conduct they did not engage in, such that a reasonable viewer or listener would believe it was realYesYesYes202401
AlaskaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone22
ArizonaDisclosure
A.R.S. 16-1024
within 90 days before an election at which the candidate will appear on the ballotsynthetic media: an image, audio recording or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech or conduct created or intentionally manipulated with digital technology to create a realistic but false image, audio or videoYesNoYes202424
ArkansasNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone01
CaliforniaProhibition + disclosure
Cal. Gov. Code 84514; placement rules in Gov. Code 84504 to 84504.4
anytimeany image, audio, or video in an advertisement that is generated or substantially altered using AIYesYesYes201929
ColoradoDisclosure
C.R.S. 1-46-101 to 1-46-106 (deepfake rule at 1-46-103); penalties at C.R.S. 1-45-111.5(1.5)(c.5)
60 days before a primary election or 90 days before a general electionimage, video, audio, or multimedia content substantially created or modified by generative AI that falsely appears authentic or truthful and depicts an individual appearing to say or do something they did not (candidates include incumbents and federal candidates)YesNoYes202412
ConnecticutNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
DelawareDisclosure
15 Del. C. 5145 (84 Del. Laws, c. 487)
within 90 days before an electionimages, audio recordings, and video recordings of a person's appearance, speech, or conduct created or manipulated with generative adversarial network techniques or other digital technology to be realistic but falseYesYesYes202423
District of ColumbiaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
FloridaDisclosure
Fla. Stat. 106.145 (ch. 2024-126, Laws of Fla.)
anytimeimages, video, audio, graphics, or other digital content created in whole or in part with generative AI that appears to depict a real person performing an action that did not actually occurYesYesYes202434
GeorgiaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
HawaiiBlocked in court
HRS 11-301 to 11-304 (2024 Haw. Sess. Laws Act 191; core rule at HRS 11-303)
from the first working day of February in each even-numbered year through the next general electionadvertisements (video, image, or audio) depicting a person saying or doing something they did not, realistic enough to fool a reasonable viewer, created by GAN or machine learning techniques, AI, or digital technologyNoNoNo202402
IdahoDisclosure
Idaho Code 67-6628A (2024 Idaho Sess. Laws ch. 172)
electioneering communications only: within 30 days before a primary or 60 days before a general election (Idaho Code 67-6602)audio or video recordings of a person's speech or conduct created with GAN techniques or other digital technology to be realistic but false, showing an event or speech that did not occur and giving a fundamentally different impression than the originalYesNoYes202423
IllinoisNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
IndianaDisclosure
Ind. Code 3-9-8-1 to 3-9-8-6 (disclaimer at 3-9-8-5)
anytimerecorded audio, recorded images, and recorded video that are altered or artificially generated (fabricated media), including AI-generated persons who are not recognizable real peopleYesNoYes202412
IowaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
KansasNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone01
KentuckyDisclosure
KRS 117.322 (definitions in KRS 117.001)
within 45 days before a primary or regular electionaudio or video recordings of an identifiable real person intentionally manipulated with generative adversarial network (machine learning) techniques to create a realistic but false depiction, made without the person's consent, that gives a fundamentally different impression than the original. Still images are not covered.YesYesYes202513
LouisianaDisclosure
La. R.S. 18:1463(A), (F), (G), (H), (I); definition of electioneering communication at R.S. 18:1483(33); AI definition at R.S. 14:73.14
anytime (the 2026 act repealed the old 60-day electioneering communication definition; timing near an election is now one factor in deciding whether a communication is electioneering)any printed, digital, or broadcast electioneering communication that portrays a candidate or an elected official subject to recall and is created, altered, or digitally manipulated using AI (image, likeness, or voice)YesYesNo202635
MaineDisclosure
21-A M.R.S. 1014(5-C), with conforming changes to 1014(3), (3-B), and (4)
anytime for express advocacy; for non-express-advocacy communications naming a candidate, the 2-A windows (28 days before a primary, 35 days before a special election, Labor Day to the general election)images, audio recordings, and video recordings depicting a candidate's appearance, speech, or conduct (any manipulation method, not only AI)YesNoYes202623
MarylandProhibition
Md. Code, Election Law 16-905 (new) and 2-110 (amended)
anytimeimages, audio recordings, and video recordings intentionally created or manipulated with generative AI or other digital technology to realistically but falsely depict a personNoYesNo202626
MassachusettsNo law
St. 2024, c. 238, s. 297 (uncodified; repealed by s. 318, effective 2025-02-01 under s. 323)
within 90 days of an election with a candidate on the ballotimages and audio or video recordings of a candidate's appearance, speech, or conduct, or about the safety or regular operations of an election, that were fabricated or intentionally manipulated so they falsely appear authenticNoneNoneNone202412
MichiganDisclosure
MCL 169.259 (AI disclosure); MCL 169.202 (definition of artificial intelligence)
anytimeany paid advertisement relating to a candidate for federal, state, or local office in Michigan, an election, or a ballot question that contains any image, audio, or video generated in whole or substantially with AIYesYesYes202313
MinnesotaProhibition
Minn. Stat. 609.771
within 90 days before a political party nominating convention, or after the start of absentee voting for a presidential nomination primary, state or local primary, or general election (as amended in 2024)any video recording, motion-picture film, sound recording, electronic image, or photograph (or technological representation substantially derived from one) so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it shows real speech or conduct, whose production depended substantially on technical means rather than a human impersonatorNoYesYes202312
MississippiDisclosure
Miss. Code Ann. 97-13-47
within 90 days of an electionimages and audio altered in a realistic manner (deepfakes) or created with software, machine learning, AI, or other computer means, that a reasonable person would believe shows real speech or conduct, where production depended substantially on technical means rather than human impersonation; disseminated by social media, email, messaging, video sharing, or any other physical or electronic methodYesYesYes202401
MissouriNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
MontanaDisclosure
MCA 13-35-801 to 13-35-804 (2025 Mont. Laws ch. 541)
within 60 days of the initiation of voting in an election at which a candidate for elective office appears on the ballotAI-generated content (image, video, audio, multimedia, or text substantially created or modified by generative AI so as to materially alter its meaning) or synthetic media (realistic but false image, audio, or video of a person made with generative AI or other digital technology) that depicts a candidate or political party, with intent to injure the candidate's or party's reputation or otherwise deceive a voter, and that shows something that did not happen or gives a fundamentally different impression than the original. Minimal AI edits that do not change meaning are excluded.YesYesYesNone12
NebraskaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
NevadaDisclosure
NRS 294A.3493
anytimesynthetic media: an image, audio recording, or video of a person's appearance, speech, or conduct intentionally manipulated with generative adversarial network techniques, AI, or generative AI to create a realistic but false depiction that a reasonable person would take as real or that gives a fundamentally different impression than the originalYesNoYes202512
New HampshireDisclosure
N.H. RSA 664:14-c
within 90 days of an election at which a candidate for elective office will appear on the ballotimages, audio and video (synthetic media and deepfakes created with AI or generative AI)YesYesYes202438
New JerseyNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone01
New MexicoDisclosure
NMSA 1978, 1-19-26.4(D) to (G)
anytimeadvertisements (including recorded phone messages) containing materially deceptive media: AI-produced images, audio or video falsely depicting an individual's speech or conductYesYesYes202424
New YorkDisclosure
N.Y. Election Law 14-106(5)
anytime (no pre-election window)any image, video, audio, text, or technological representation of speech or conduct created or modified by software, machine learning, AI or other technological means that looks or sounds indistinguishable from reality to a reasonable person and depicts a scenario that did not occur or was significantly alteredYesNoYes202434
North CarolinaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
North DakotaDisclosure
N.D.C.C. 16.1-10-04.2
anytimeimages, graphics, videos, audio, text, or other digital content created in whole or in part with AI to visually or audibly impersonate a humanYesYesNo202535
OhioNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
OklahomaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
OregonDisclosure
ORS 260.268 (rules authority in ORS 260.269); complaint process in ORS 260.345
anytimeimages, audio recordings, and video recordings of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct intentionally manipulated with AI techniques or similar digital technologyYesNoYes202413
PennsylvaniaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone12
Rhode IslandDisclosure
R.I. Gen. Laws 17-30-1 to 17-30-4
within 90 days of any election at which a candidate for elective office will appear on the ballotimages, audio recordings, and video recordings of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct intentionally manipulated with generative adversarial network techniques or other digital technology to create a realistic but false depiction that gives a fundamentally different impression than the originalYesNoYes202523
South CarolinaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone01
South DakotaDisclosure
S.D. Codified Laws 12-26-32 to 12-26-37
within 90 days of an electionimages, audio recordings, and video recordings created or manipulated with AI or other digital technologyYesYesYes202512
TennesseeDisclosure
Tenn. Code Ann. 2-19-120(a)(6); deepfake defined in 39-17-1902; remedies in 39-17-1904
anytime for depictions of incumbent officeholders; within 120 days of the initiation of voting in an election where the depicted candidate is on the ballot for non-incumbentsaudio and video deepfakes, meaning videos, images, or audio files generated or manipulated by AI to realistically portray something that did not occur, that impersonate or depict a candidateYesYesYes202634
TexasProhibition
Tex. Elec. Code 255.004(d) and (e); penalty in 255.004(c)
publication or distribution within 30 days of an electionvideo only. A "deep fake video" is a video, created with the intent to deceive, that appears to depict a real person performing an action that did not occur in reality.NoYesNo201923
UtahDisclosure
Utah Code 20A-11-1104
anytimeaudio, images, and video substantially produced by generative AI ("synthetic audio media" and "synthetic visual media"), whether or not they depict a real personYesNoYes202424
VermontDisclosure
17 V.S.A. 2031 to 2033 (subchapter 4), 2041 to 2042 (subchapter 5)
within 90 days before an election in VermontImages, audio recordings, and video recordings of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct created or intentionally manipulated with digital technology, including artificial intelligence. Only "deceptive and fraudulent" synthetic media is regulated: media that appears to a reasonable person to realistically depict (A) a political candidate in a way that injures a candidate's reputation, or (B) an individual in a way that attempts to unduly influence an election, including a public question, by giving voters materially false information.YesNoYes202624
VirginiaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone11
WashingtonDisclosure
RCW 29B.35.010 to 29B.35.030 (formerly RCW 42.62.020 to 42.62.040; recodified by Laws of 2024 ch. 164 effective Jan. 1, 2026)
Electioneering communications only: broadcast, cable, satellite, radio, digital communication, mail, billboard, newspaper, or periodical ads that clearly identify a state, local, or judicial candidate, are distributed within 60 days before that candidate's election, and cost $1,000 or more (RCW 29B.10.220)Images, audio recordings, and video recordings of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct intentionally manipulated with generative adversarial network techniques or other digital technology to create a realistic but false depiction that a reasonable person would believe is real and that gives a fundamentally different impression than the unaltered originalYesNoYes202325
West VirginiaNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone00
WisconsinDisclosure
Wis. Stat. 11.1303(2m)
anytimeAudio and video content substantially produced in whole or in part by means of generative artificial intelligenceYesNoNo202412
WyomingNo lawNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone01
Prohibition: Distributing deceptive AI media of a candidate near an election is illegal, with no disclaimer safe harbor.Prohibition + disclosure: Some deceptive AI media is banned outright and other AI content needs a disclaimer.Disclosure: Deceptive AI media of candidates is allowed only with a clear disclaimer, usually inside a pre-election window.Blocked in court: The state passed an election AI law but a court has blocked enforcement.No law: No state statute specifically regulates AI or deepfakes in political ads. General defamation, fraud and election law still apply.

What changed

New political AI laws in 2026

September 19, 2026 (effective)

California: AB 2839 (2024), rewritten by AB 502 (2026), Elections: deceptive media in advertisements. Applies Candidates: 30 days before any California election in which the candidate is running. Elected officials: 30 days before any California election. Elections officials, ballots, voting machines, voting sites and election property: 30 days before through 38 days after the election, inclusive..

August 1, 2026 (effective)

Louisiana: HB 459 (2026 Regular Session), Act 806, Disclosure of artificial intelligence in electioneering communications portraying candidates. Applies anytime (the 2026 act repealed the old 60-day electioneering communication definition; timing near an election is now one factor in deciding whether a communication is electioneering).

August 1, 2026 (effective)

Louisiana: HB 639 (2026 Regular Session), Act 559; underlying statute Acts 2008, No. 810, Telephone campaign communications: source disclosure and AI voice disclosure. Applies anytime.

July 29, 2026 (effective)

Maine: LD 517 (HP 335), 132nd Legislature; Public Law 2025, chapter 593, An Act Regarding Synthetic Media in Campaign Advertising. Applies anytime for express advocacy; for non-express-advocacy communications naming a candidate, the 2-A windows (28 days before a primary, 35 days before a special election, Labor Day to the general election).

July 1, 2026 (effective)

Tennessee: HB 1513 / SB 1624 (2026), Public Chapter 625, Transparency for Deepfakes in Political Advertising Act. Applies anytime for depictions of incumbent officeholders; within 120 days of the initiation of voting in an election where the depicted candidate is on the ballot for non-incumbents.

July 1, 2026 (effective)

Tennessee: HB 1513 / SB 1624 (2026), Public Chapter 625, Transparency for Deepfakes in Political Advertising Act (audio). Applies anytime for incumbents; within 120 days of the start of voting for non-incumbents.

June 1, 2026 (effective)

Maryland: SB 141 (2026), Chapter 444 (cross-file HB 145), Election Law: Election Misinformation, Election Disinformation, and Deepfakes. Applies anytime.

March 5, 2026 (effective)

Vermont: S.23 (Act 75 of 2026), An act relating to the use of synthetic media in elections. Applies within 90 days before an election in Vermont.

March 5, 2026 (effective)

Vermont: S.23 (Act 75 of 2026), Audio deepfake disclosure (applies to prerecorded calls and voicemail). Applies within 90 days before an election in Vermont.

January 1, 2026 (effective)

Nevada: AB 73 (2025), Statutes of Nevada 2025, chapter 224, Disclosure of synthetic media in political communications. Applies anytime.

How fast the states moved

Election AI laws enacted per year. Texas went first in 2019; the wave came in 2024, the first presidential cycle with cheap generative video and voice cloning.

20192
20234
202419
20255
20266

The federal layer

What applies in every state

At the federal level, the binding rules that hit AI in campaigns today are the TCPA and FCC robocall rules, not any AI-specific election law. Since February 2024 the FCC treats AI-generated voices as "artificial" voices, so AI voice calls to cell phones need prior express consent (political calls included), AI or prerecorded political calls to landlines are limited to three per 30 days without consent, and every such message must identify the caller, give a callback number and offer an opt-out. The FEC says its existing fraudulent misrepresentation ban covers AI, but it has had no quorum since April 2025 and cannot enforce. Proposed FCC rules on AI disclosure in broadcast political ads and in AI calls were never adopted, and no federal AI political ad disclaimer bill has passed. Federal efforts to preempt state AI laws (a 2025 moratorium the Senate struck 99 to 1, and Executive Order 14365) have not displaced any state election or robocall law as of October 2026.

  • FCC: FCC Declaratory Ruling: AI-generated voices are "artificial" voices under the TCPA (FCC 24-17, CG Docket 23-362). An AI voice agent that talks to voters is treated like a robocall, not a live volunteer, so cell phone calls need prior express consent even for political calls. Each unlawful call can bring $500 in statutory damages, up to $1,500 if willful, under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3).
  • FCC: TCPA rules that reach political robocalls and AI voice calls (47 U.S.C. 227 and 47 CFR 64.1200). An AI voice phonebank must open by naming the campaign or committee, give a callback number, provide a working opt-out, and stay within three calls per 30 days to each landline without consent. Calls to cell phones without prior express consent are the main liability risk.
  • FCC: FCC Declaratory Ruling: ringless voicemail is a "call" under the TCPA (FCC 22-85). Dropping AI-voiced or prerecorded political voicemails onto cell phones without ringing them is not a loophole. It needs prior express consent like any other robocall to a cell phone.
  • FCC: FCC proposed rules on AI-generated calls and texts (NPRM, FCC 24-84, CG Docket 23-362). If adopted, AI voice calls would need an on-call AI disclosure and AI-specific consent language. Today it is not binding, but it signals where federal rules could go.
  • FCC: FCC proposed AI disclosure rules for political ads on TV and radio (NPRM, FCC 24-74, MB Docket 24-211). There is no federal rule requiring an AI disclaimer on broadcast political ads. State laws, not the FCC, are what currently require AI disclosures in political ads.
  • FCC: Lingo Telecom consent decree over the New Hampshire Biden deepfake robocalls ($1 million). Carriers and dialer platforms are now under pressure to vet who is sending political robocalls and whose caller ID is used. Expect stricter know-your-customer checks before AI or prerecorded political calls are carried.

Federal AI rules, the TCPA and the state preemption fight

HyperPhonebank

Voter contact that clears every state's AI rules before the first dial.

Live professional callers and AI voice programs for voter ID, persuasion, ballot chase and GOTV, scripted to the disclosure and consent rules on this page, with every call graded and a real time dashboard.

Method, sources and reuse

Each jurisdiction was researched from public trackers (Public Citizen, NCSL, Ballotpedia, IAPP) and then confirmed on the official legislature or codified statute page, with 2025 and 2026 sessions, vetoes, injunctions and delayed effective dates checked. Statutory disclaimer wording is quoted exactly. Anything that could not be confirmed is marked on the state page rather than guessed.

The full dataset is free to reuse with credit under CC BY 4.0: CSV · JSON.

Cite as: The Political Group, “Political AI Law Tracker 2026,” https://www.thepoliticalgroup.com/ai-laws, verified October 5, 2026. This page summarizes statutes for campaigns and is not legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Which states have laws on AI deepfakes in political ads?

30 states as of October 5, 2026: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

Which states have no law on AI in political ads?

19 states: Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming, plus the District of Columbia. In these states no statute targets AI or deepfakes in campaign ads, but defamation, fraud, false-statement election laws and federal rules still apply.

What does a political deepfake disclaimer have to say?

It depends on the state. 21 jurisdictions prescribe exact wording, such as Colorado's "This (image/audio/video/multimedia) has been edited and depicts speech or conduct that falsely appears to be authentic or truthful." Others only require a clear statement that the media was manipulated or generated by AI. The disclaimer generator on this page returns the exact text for every state you select.

Is it illegal to use AI in a political ad?

Using AI to write copy, edit footage or generate background images is legal everywhere. What states regulate is synthetic media that falsely shows a real candidate saying or doing something they did not, usually within a set window before an election. Most states allow it with a disclaimer; a few ban it outright.

Can a campaign use AI voices for robocalls?

Yes, with conditions. The FCC ruled in February 2024 that AI-generated voices are artificial voices under the TCPA, so AI voice calls to cell phones need prior express consent, landline calls must follow prerecorded-message rules, and every call must identify the caller at the start. Several states add their own robocall or disclosure rules; the AI voice calls lens on the map shows which.

Is there a federal law on AI in political ads?

Not a statute specific to political ads as of October 5, 2026. At the federal level, the binding rules that hit AI in campaigns today are the TCPA and FCC robocall rules, not any AI-specific election law. Since February 2024 the FCC treats AI-generated voices as "artificial" voices, so AI voice calls to cell phones need prior express consent (political calls included), AI or prerecorded political calls to landlines are limited to three per 30 days without consent, and every such message must identify the caller, give a callback number and offer an opt-out. The FEC says its existing fraudulent misrepresentation ban covers AI, but it has had no quorum since April 2025 and cannot enforce. Proposed FCC rules on AI disclosure in broadcast political ads and in AI calls were never adopted, and no federal AI political ad disclaimer bill has passed. Federal efforts to preempt state AI laws (a 2025 moratorium the Senate struck 99 to 1, and Executive Order 14365) have not displaced any state election or robocall law as of October 2026.

Which states make political deepfakes a crime?

17 states attach criminal penalties: Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas. Other states with a law rely on civil penalties, injunctions or lawsuits by the depicted candidate.

Can a candidate sue over an AI deepfake?

In 25 states the statute lets the depicted candidate sue for an injunction and in many cases damages: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont and Washington. Everywhere, defamation and false light claims remain available.

How often is this tracker updated?

Every state was verified against official legislature and statute pages as of October 5, 2026. Pages show the date each state was last verified. Laws are re-checked during and after each legislative session and whenever a court rules.