Texas · U.S. House · District 33 · November 3, 2026

What it would have taken for Patrick Gillespie.

Before the election, as last updated September 26, 2026: Allred starts 38.5 points ahead on our starting line from recent official results. Campaign work can move about 3,566 net votes toward Gillespie, a 2.4-point gain. Winning outright would take a 36.1-point national wave on top of that. Here is the plan that makes Gillespie the one standing if one comes.

57,747
net votes between Gillespie and a win
Lost
Colin Allred won. Election held November 3, 2026.
38.5 pts
Allred lead, our starting line from recent results
The result · November 3, 2026

Colin Allred won.

Patrick Gillespie finished 18.7 points behind our starting line. The plan below stays up as the record of what it would have taken.

Colin Allred · Democratic ✓78.6%
Patrick Gillespie · Republican21.4%

Projected winner; unofficial results until the state certifies. Source · Second source

The number

74,955 votes.

That is half of the 149,908 ballots we expect in this race, plus one. Where Gillespie stands today, and what is missing:

44,119 Patrick Gillespie baseline
101,866 Colin Allred baseline

Starting line: a weighted blend of the official 2022 and 2024 results in this district (President, U.S. Senate, Railroad Commissioner, Governor, Attorney General). No 2026 polls have been published. 2026 turnout modeled on 2022, the last midterm.

The odds

0% today. A wave changes that.

We ran this race 20,000 times with realistic error on every assumption. Drag the slider to see the odds move as the campaign captures more of what history says is available.

Gillespie wins in
0%
of 20,000 simulated elections
With no plan
0%
tieGillespie loses by 81,188loses by 26,744
How much of what history allows the campaign achieves100%
The plan on this page sits at 100%. Median outcome at this setting: Gillespie short by 54,315.

Each simulation draws the starting line with an error of 7 points of margin (no 2026 polls, so the starting line comes from history and carries more error) and lets the plan over- or under-deliver by 30 percent. Seeded and reproducible; the method and data are at the bottom of the page.

Three moves

The gap closes three ways.

Change minds. Bring out voters who skip midterms. Win back the third-party vote. Every pool below is counted from official precinct returns and published polls.

Persuade
3,128
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 3,128

Who. 3,128 voters who split their ticket in recent elections and lean Allred today.

How. Live conversations on the call list that matters: voters who crossed party lines, plus the undecided. Gillespie needs to win 50 percent of the ones now leaning Allred.

Mobilize
23
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 110

Who. Few precincts give Gillespie's side 55 percent or more, so turnout is a small lever here; the plan leans on persuasion instead.

How. Voter ID calls to people who voted in 2024 and skipped 2022, then a ballot chase until each one has voted.

Consolidate
415
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 1,186

Who. Voters who went third party in recent races, in the closest places on the map.

How. A direct appeal to voters who went third party last time. They have already shown they will leave the two-party default.

Together: 3,566 net votes against a gap of 57,747. Still 54,181 short. The rest needs a national shift of about 36.1 points that no campaign controls.

Where it is won

12 precincts carry 18% of it.

Ranked by the net votes each one gives the plan. The darker the county, the more of the upset lives there.

Anderson CountyAndrews CountyAngelina CountyAransas CountyArcher CountyArmstrong CountyAtascosa CountyAustin CountyBailey CountyBandera CountyBastrop CountyBaylor CountyBee CountyBell CountyBexar CountyBlanco CountyBorden CountyBosque CountyBowie CountyBrazoria CountyBrazos CountyBrewster CountyBriscoe CountyBrooks CountyBrown CountyBurleson CountyBurnet CountyCaldwell CountyCalhoun CountyCallahan CountyCameron CountyCamp CountyCarson CountyCass CountyCastro CountyChambers CountyCherokee CountyChildress CountyClay CountyCochran CountyCoke CountyColeman CountyCollin CountyCollingsworth CountyColorado CountyComal CountyComanche CountyConcho CountyCooke CountyCoryell CountyCottle CountyCrane CountyCrockett CountyCrosby CountyCulberson CountyDallam CountyDallas County: 3,566 net votes in the planDawson CountyDeWitt CountyDeaf Smith CountyDelta CountyDenton CountyDickens CountyDimmit CountyDonley CountyDuval CountyEastland CountyEctor CountyEdwards CountyEl Paso CountyEllis CountyErath CountyFalls CountyFannin CountyFayette CountyFisher CountyFloyd CountyFoard CountyFort Bend CountyFranklin CountyFreestone CountyFrio CountyGaines CountyGalveston CountyGarza CountyGillespie CountyGlasscock CountyGoliad CountyGonzales CountyGray CountyGrayson CountyGregg CountyGrimes CountyGuadalupe CountyHale CountyHall CountyHamilton CountyHansford CountyHardeman CountyHardin CountyHarris CountyHarrison CountyHartley CountyHaskell CountyHays CountyHemphill CountyHenderson CountyHidalgo CountyHill CountyHockley CountyHood CountyHopkins CountyHouston CountyHoward CountyHudspeth CountyHunt CountyHutchinson CountyIrion CountyJack CountyJackson CountyJasper CountyJeff Davis CountyJefferson CountyJim Hogg CountyJim Wells CountyJohnson CountyJones CountyKarnes CountyKaufman CountyKendall CountyKenedy CountyKent CountyKerr CountyKimble CountyKing CountyKinney CountyKleberg CountyKnox CountyLa Salle CountyLamar CountyLamb CountyLampasas CountyLavaca CountyLee CountyLeon CountyLiberty CountyLimestone CountyLipscomb CountyLive Oak CountyLlano CountyLoving CountyLubbock CountyLynn CountyMadison CountyMarion CountyMartin CountyMason CountyMatagorda CountyMaverick CountyMcCulloch CountyMcLennan CountyMcMullen CountyMedina CountyMenard CountyMidland CountyMilam CountyMills CountyMitchell CountyMontague CountyMontgomery CountyMoore CountyMorris CountyMotley CountyNacogdoches CountyNavarro CountyNewton CountyNolan CountyNueces CountyOchiltree CountyOldham CountyOrange CountyPalo Pinto CountyPanola CountyParker CountyParmer CountyPecos CountyPolk CountyPotter CountyPresidio CountyRains CountyRandall CountyReagan CountyReal CountyRed River CountyReeves CountyRefugio CountyRoberts CountyRobertson CountyRockwall CountyRunnels CountyRusk CountySabine CountySan Augustine CountySan Jacinto CountySan Patricio CountySan Saba CountySchleicher CountyScurry CountyShackelford CountyShelby CountySherman CountySmith CountySomervell CountyStarr CountyStephens CountySterling CountyStonewall CountySutton CountySwisher CountyTarrant CountyTaylor CountyTerrell CountyTerry CountyThrockmorton CountyTitus CountyTom Green CountyTravis CountyTrinity CountyTyler CountyUpshur CountyUpton CountyUvalde CountyVal Verde CountyVan Zandt CountyVictoria CountyWalker CountyWaller CountyWard CountyWashington CountyWebb CountyWharton CountyWheeler CountyWichita CountyWilbarger CountyWillacy CountyWilliamson CountyWilson CountyWinkler CountyWise CountyWood CountyYoakum CountyYoung CountyZapata CountyZavala CountyDallas
Fewer net votesMore net votes for the upset
  1. 01
    Precinct 1060 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +33. 5.0% split their ticket.
    +84
  2. 02
    Precinct 2605 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +28. 7.6% split their ticket.
    +58
  3. 03
    Precinct 4079 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +51. 4.1% split their ticket.
    +57
  4. 04
    Precinct 2602 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +27. 6.0% split their ticket.
    +54
  5. 05
    Precinct 2102 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +15. 4.1% split their ticket.
    +51
  6. 06
    Precinct 3000 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +14. 4.4% split their ticket.
    +51
  7. 07
    Precinct 1048 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +20. 4.6% split their ticket.
    +50
  8. 08
    Precinct 2603 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +26. 5.7% split their ticket.
    +48
  9. 09
    Precinct 2147 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +25. 6.6% split their ticket.
    +48
  10. 10
    Precinct 2604 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +30. 4.9% split their ticket.
    +44
  11. 11
    Precinct 4521 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +15. 3.5% split their ticket.
    +44
  12. 12
    Precinct 2099 (Dallas County)persuade
    Starting line Allred +44. 3.7% split their ticket.
    +43
What the numbers say that the polls do not

The hidden path.

Precinct 1060 (Dallas County) carries the most.

Precinct 1060 (Dallas County) gives this plan more net votes than any other precinct: 84. It sits at Allred +33 on our starting line, and 5.0 percent of its voters split their ticket in recent elections.

Precinct 2605 (Dallas County) splits its ticket the most.

Of the precincts in this plan, Precinct 2605 (Dallas County) has the highest share of ticket splitters: 7.6 percent. That is where a persuasion call is most likely to reach someone open to crossing over.

The honest math.

Every lever at its historical ceiling moves 3,566 net votes. The gap is 57,747. That is the measure of what a strong campaign adds: 2.4 points of margin, and a head start if the national mood breaks.

The evidence

Where voters cross over.

Every dot is a precinct. If no one split a ticket, every dot would sit on the line. The orange ones are where Gillespie's side lost voters it won further up the ballot.

-100-100-80-80-60-60-40-40-20-2000+20+20+40+40+60+60+80+80+100+100Gillespie's side, President 2024 margin (points)U.S. Senate 2024 margin (points)
Precincts
258
Slope
0.976
R²
0.958
Residual SD
3.5 pts
Crossover precincts
63

Weighted least squares, one point per precinct, weighted by ballots cast. Orange precincts sit more than one residual standard deviation below the line: Gillespie's side did worse there in this race than the top of the ticket predicts. Hover any dot for the precinct.

The plan, as published

The calendar it ran on.

  1. Now to October 5
    Find them

    Voter ID calls across the persuasion list in these precincts. Every conversation tags the voter: with Gillespie, with Allred, or undecided. The undecided become the persuasion universe; the supporters become the ballot chase list.

  2. October 6 to 18
    Persuade

    Second conversations with every undecided and soft voter, built around the one issue they named on the first call. The goal is 3,128 net votes from people who have crossed party lines before. Every supporter it finds goes straight onto the ballot chase.

  3. October 19 to 25
    Bank the ballots

    Mail ballots are already going out, and in-person early voting runs October 19 through October 30. Mail ballot applications must be received by October 23. Chase every supporter's mail ballot until it is returned, and move supporters to early voting while it is open.

  4. October 26 to November 2
    Turn them out

    The last push goes to every identified supporter who has not voted yet; few drop-off voters live where Gillespie is favored, so this is a chase, not a turnout drive. In-person early voting ends October 30. Mail ballots count if received by 7 p.m. on November 3, or by 5 p.m. on November 4 if postmarked by Election Day.

  5. November 3
    Election day

    Polls are open 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Texas has no same-day registration; the registration deadline is October 5. The last calls go to identified supporters who have not voted, with their polling place in hand.

What has to be true

No wishful thinking.

Official results in this district: Harris carried the 2024 presidential race by 32.7 points; Allred carried the 2024 U.S. Senate race by 40.1 points; O'Rourke carried the 2022 governor's race by 44.0 points.

  1. Gillespie wins 50 percent of the ticket splitters now leaning Allred.
  2. It would take a national shift of about 36.1 points toward Gillespie's side, larger than any midterm swing in recent memory.
  3. No 2026 public poll exists for this race, so the starting line is a weighted blend of official recent results; the first real poll will move it.
The work

819 conversations.

That is how many live voter conversations this plan called for: about 15,633 dials to 5,211 households, before the last ballot was cast.

5,211
households on the target list
16K
dials across three attempts
819
live conversations: persuasion, voter ID, ballot chase

Call list: every ticket splitter and undecided voter in the targeted places (you cannot tell which way they lean before the call), every targeted drop-off voter, and the reachable third-party voters. About 69 households for every 100 voters on the list, three attempts each, and a 5.24 percent live answer rate per attempt, the per-program average across 1.2 million real 2026 dials in our published benchmarks.

HyperPhonebank

Running next cycle? We run lists like this.

Calls are the voter ID and ballot chase engine of this plan. They find the persuadable voters and the supporters, so every other dollar lands on the right door. The full call program for this list is an estimated $2,714 at our published rates: 5,211 households, three attempts each.

Professional live callers working exactly these precincts: persuasion on the ticket splitters, voter ID on the fence, ballot chase on every absentee request until it is returned. A live dashboard shows every conversation as it happens. Days to launch, not weeks.

The candidates

Who is on the ballot.

Underdog

Patrick Gillespie (R)

Customs broker and former technical writer who worked for Boeing and BAE Systems, and a former vice president of International Association of Machinists Local Lodge 2768.

Favorite

Colin Allred (D)

Former U.S. representative for the 32nd District (2019 to 2025), civil rights attorney and former Tennessee Titans linebacker; a Baylor and UC Berkeley law graduate who served at HUD in the Obama administration.

Cash on hand $159,887 and $7,431,941 raised since January 1, 2025, per FEC reports through June 30, 2026.

Underdog Updates

What changed, and when.

We re-ran this race as new polls, fundraising reports and early vote counts arrived, and logged the result against the plan. Every change is listed here.

  1. November 5, 2026
    Result: Patrick Gillespie lost

    Unofficial result: Patrick Gillespie 21.4%, Colin Allred 78.6%, a margin of 57.2 points. Our starting line had Allred +38.5; Gillespie fell short of that line by 18.7 points. This page stays up as the record of the plan and how it compared with the outcome.

  2. September 26, 2026
    Underdog plan published

    Starting line: Allred +38.5. Patrick Gillespie needs 57,747 net votes. Odds 0% today, 0% with the plan.

Share this plan. Running this campaign, or backing it? This page is yours to share with your team and supporters.
Share

Questions

Who won TX-33 in 2026?

Colin Allred won on November 3, 2026. Unofficial result: Patrick Gillespie 21.4%, Colin Allred 78.6%, a margin of 57.2 points. Our starting line had Allred +38.5; Gillespie fell short of that line by 18.7 points.

Can Patrick Gillespie win Texas's 33rd Congressional District in 2026?

Not on current numbers. Campaign work can move about 3,566 net votes against a gap of 57,747; the rest would take a 36.1-point national shift, far larger than any recent midterm has produced.

Where are the votes Patrick Gillespie needs?

Ranked by net votes in the plan: Precinct 1060 (Dallas County), Precinct 2605 (Dallas County), Precinct 4079 (Dallas County), Precinct 2602 (Dallas County), Precinct 2102 (Dallas County). Persuadable voters are counted from ticket splitting in 2022 and 2024 official returns; turnout targets are people who voted in 2024 and skipped 2022.

How many voters does Patrick Gillespie need to persuade?

About 1,564 voters who lean Colin Allred today, each worth two votes of margin when they switch. That is 50 percent of the 3,128 persuadable voters leaning Colin Allred.

When does early voting start in Texas in 2026?

In-person early voting in Texas runs October 19 through October 30, 2026. The voter registration deadline is October 5, and applications for a mail ballot must be received by October 23. Mail ballots count if received by 7 p.m. on Election Day, or by 5 p.m. the next day if postmarked by Election Day. Texas does not offer same-day registration.

Who made this analysis?

The Political Group, an independent campaign services firm, from official Texas Secretary of State precinct returns, Census data, FEC filings and published polls. It is not affiliated with any candidate or party.

Method and sources

Precinct math from official Texas Secretary of State returns for 2022 and 2024, projected onto current district lines. Polls, ratings and fundraising as published on the dates shown. This is independent analysis by The Political Group, as of September 26, 2026. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by any candidate or party, and it is written for every campaign that starts behind.

Statistics: a weighted least squares crossover regression on every precinct, and 20,000 seeded Monte Carlo simulations. The baseline error (7 points of margin) and plan efficacy spread (30 percent) are our stated assumptions. Download the precinct data (CSV, ready for JASP). Free to cite under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page.

Race coverage

More Texas underdogs

Texas U.S. Senate
How Ken Paxton wins
265,529 net votes to find
TX-01
What it would take for Yolanda Prince
119,795 net votes to find
TX-02
What it would take for Shaun Finnie
55,482 net votes to find
TX-03
What it would take for Evan Hunt
57,216 net votes to find
TX-04
What it would take for Jason Pearce
61,109 net votes to find
TX-05
What it would take for Chelsey Hockett
43,166 net votes to find
TX-06
What it would take for Danny Minton
50,211 net votes to find
TX-07
What it would take for Alexander Hale
51,235 net votes to find
TX-08
What it would take for Laura Jones
56,168 net votes to find
TX-09
What it would take for Leticia Gutierrez
20,806 net votes to find
TX-10
What it would take for Caitlin Rourk
52,107 net votes to find
TX-11
What it would take for Claire Reynolds
67,733 net votes to find
TX-12
What it would take for Angela "Heli" Rodriguez Prilliman
48,061 net votes to find
TX-13
What it would take for Mark Nair
102,644 net votes to find
TX-14
What it would take for Thurman "Bill" Bartie
56,491 net votes to find
TX-15
How Monica De La Cruz wins
7,158 net votes to find
TX-16
What it would take for Adam Bauman
34,487 net votes to find
TX-17
What it would take for Casey Shepard
48,953 net votes to find
TX-18
What it would take for Ronald Whitfield
101,469 net votes to find
TX-19
What it would take for Kyle Rable
102,579 net votes to find
TX-20
What it would take for Edgardo Rafael Baez
56,424 net votes to find
TX-21
What it would take for Kristin Hook
65,730 net votes to find
TX-22
What it would take for Marquette Greene-Scott
52,088 net votes to find
TX-23
How Katy Padilla Stout wins
10,194 net votes to find
TX-24
What it would take for Kevin Burge
45,794 net votes to find
TX-25
What it would take for Dione Sims
52,061 net votes to find
TX-26
What it would take for Steven Shook
63,948 net votes to find
TX-27
What it would take for Tanya Lloyd
49,699 net votes to find
TX-28
How Tano E. Tijerina wins
2,378 net votes to find
TX-29
What it would take for Martha Fierro
43,740 net votes to find
TX-30
What it would take for Everett Jackson
88,196 net votes to find
TX-31
What it would take for Justin Early
55,295 net votes to find
TX-32
What it would take for Dan Barrios
36,637 net votes to find
TX-34
How Eric Flores wins
3,399 net votes to find
TX-35
How Johnny Garcia wins
16,348 net votes to find
TX-36
What it would take for Rhonda Hart
53,363 net votes to find
TX-37
What it would take for Lauren Peña
162,220 net votes to find
TX-38
What it would take for Melissa McDonough
55,417 net votes to find