California · U.S. House · District 39 · November 3, 2026

What it would take for Steve Manos.

Takano starts 9.1 points ahead on our starting line from recent official results. Campaign work can move about 742 net votes toward Manos, a 0.5-point gain. Winning outright would take a 8.5-point national wave on top of that. Here is the plan that makes Manos the one standing if one comes.

12,369
net votes between Manos and a win
37
days to election day. Mail voting opens October 5.
9.1 pts
Takano lead, our starting line from recent results
In short

A long shot on the math: it takes a 8.5-point national wave.

Odds today10%
Odds with the plan12%
Net votes to find12,369
WhereRiverside, Moreno Valley, Jurupa Valley
Underdog UpdateSeptember 26, 2026. Underdog plan published. Starting line: Takano +9.1. Steve Manos needs 12,369 net votes. Odds 10% today, 12% with the plan.
The number

68,292 votes.

That is half of the 136,583 ballots we expect in this race, plus one. Where Manos stands today, and what is missing:

61,261 Steve Manos baseline
73,631 Mark Takano baseline

Starting line: a weighted blend of the official 2022 and 2024 results in this district (President, U.S. Senate, Governor, Attorney General). No 2026 polls have been published. 2026 turnout modeled on 2022, the last midterm.

The odds

10% today. A wave changes that.

We ran this race 20,000 times with realistic error on every assumption. Drag the slider to see the odds move as the campaign captures more of what history says is available.

Manos wins in
12%
of 20,000 simulated elections
With no plan
10%
tieManos loses by 36,303wins by 12,590
How much of what history allows the campaign achieves100%
The plan on this page sits at 100%. Median outcome at this setting: Manos short by 11,529.

Each simulation draws the starting line with an error of 7 points of margin (no 2026 polls, so the starting line comes from history and carries more error) and lets the plan over- or under-deliver by 30 percent. Seeded and reproducible; the method and data are at the bottom of the page.

Three moves

The gap closes three ways.

Change minds. Bring out voters who skip midterms. Win back the third-party vote. Every pool below is counted from official precinct returns and published polls.

Persuade
472
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 472

Who. 472 voters who split their ticket in recent elections and lean Takano today.

How. Live conversations on the call list that matters: voters who crossed party lines, plus the undecided. Manos needs to win 50 percent of the ones now leaning Takano.

Mobilize
0
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 0

Who. There are almost no cities and unincorporated areas Manos's side carries, so turnout alone cannot help here.

How. Voter ID calls to people who voted in 2024 and skipped 2022, then a ballot chase until each one has voted.

Consolidate
270
net votes in the plan, from a pool of 771

Who. Voters who went third party in recent races, in the cities and unincorporated areas that lean Manos's way.

How. A direct appeal to voters who went third party last time. They have already shown they will leave the two-party default.

Together: 742 net votes against a gap of 12,369. Still 11,627 short. The rest needs a national shift of about 8.5 points that no campaign controls.

Where it is won

5 cities and unincorporated areas carry 100% of it.

Ranked by the net votes each one gives the plan. The darker the county, the more of the upset lives there.

Alameda CountyAlpine CountyAmador CountyButte CountyCalaveras CountyColusa CountyContra Costa CountyDel Norte CountyEl Dorado CountyFresno CountyGlenn CountyHumboldt CountyImperial CountyInyo CountyKern CountyKings CountyLake CountyLassen CountyLos Angeles CountyMadera CountyMarin CountyMariposa CountyMendocino CountyMerced CountyModoc CountyMono CountyMonterey CountyNapa CountyNevada CountyOrange CountyPlacer CountyPlumas CountyRiverside County: 742 net votes in the planSacramento CountySan Benito CountySan Bernardino CountySan Diego CountySan Francisco CountySan Joaquin CountySan Luis Obispo CountySan Mateo CountySanta Barbara CountySanta Clara CountySanta Cruz CountyShasta CountySierra CountySiskiyou CountySolano CountySonoma CountyStanislaus CountySutter CountyTehama CountyTrinity CountyTulare CountyTuolumne CountyVentura CountyYolo CountyYuba CountyRiverside
Fewer net votesMore net votes for the upset
  1. 01
    Riversidepersuade
    Starting line Takano +5. 0.9% split their ticket.
    +462
  2. 02
    Moreno Valleypersuade
    Starting line Takano +20.
    +120
  3. 03
    Jurupa Valleyconsolidate
    Starting line Manos +2.
    +67
  4. 04
    Perrispersuade
    Starting line Takano +24. 1.1% split their ticket.
    +62
  5. 05
    Unincorporated Riverside Countypersuade
    Starting line Takano +2. 0.5% split their ticket.
    +31
What the numbers say that the polls do not

The hidden path.

Riverside carries the most.

Riverside gives this plan more net votes than any other place: 462. It sits at Takano +5 on our starting line, and 0.9 percent of its voters split their ticket in recent elections.

Perris splits its ticket the most.

Of the cities and unincorporated areas in this plan, Perris has the highest share of ticket splitters: 1.1 percent. That is where a persuasion call is most likely to reach someone open to crossing over.

The honest math.

Every lever at its historical ceiling moves 742 net votes. The gap is 12,369. That is the measure of what a strong campaign adds: 0.5 points of margin, and first position if the national mood breaks.

The evidence

Where voters cross over.

Every dot is a precinct. If no one split a ticket, every dot would sit on the line. The orange ones are where Manos's side lost voters it won further up the ballot.

-80-80-60-60-40-40-20-2000+20+20+40+40+60+60Manos's side, President 2024 margin (points)U.S. Senate 2024 margin (points)
Precincts
224
Slope
1.062
R²
0.975
Residual SD
2.6 pts
Crossover precincts
51

Weighted least squares, one point per precinct, weighted by ballots cast. Orange precincts sit more than one residual standard deviation below the line: Manos's side did worse there in this race than the top of the ticket predicts. Hover any dot for the precinct.

The next 37 days

Voting starts October 5.

  1. Now to October 4
    Find them

    Voter ID calls across the persuasion list in these cities and unincorporated areas. Every conversation tags the voter: with Manos, with Takano, or undecided. The undecided become the persuasion universe; the supporters become the ballot chase list.

  2. October 5 to 16
    Persuade

    Second conversations with every undecided and soft voter, built around the one issue they named on the first call. The goal is 472 net votes from people who have crossed party lines before.

  3. October 17 to 26
    Bank the ballots

    California mails a ballot to every active registered voter starting October 5. Ballots postmarked by November 3 count if they arrive by November 10, and conditional voter registration is open through Election Day. Chase every supporter's mail ballot request until it is returned, and move supporters to early voting while it is open.

  4. October 27 to November 2
    Turn them out

    The drop-off voters: people who voted in 2024 and skipped 2022. At least 0 of them live where Manos is favored. Ballots postmarked by November 3 count if they arrive by November 10.

  5. November 3
    Election day

    Polls and vote centers are open until 8 p.m. California allows conditional voter registration through Election Day. The last calls go to identified supporters who have not voted, with their polling place in hand.

What has to be true

No wishful thinking.

Official results in this district: Harris carried the 2024 presidential race by 9.5 points; Schiff carried the 2024 U.S. Senate race by 9.1 points; Newsom carried the 2022 governor's race by 9.1 points.

  1. Manos wins 50 percent of the ticket splitters now leaning Takano.
  2. The national environment moves about 8.5 points toward Manos's side between now and November 3.
  3. No 2026 public poll exists for this race, so the starting line is a weighted blend of official recent results; the first real poll will move it.
The work

186 conversations.

That is how many live voter conversations this plan takes: about 3,550 dials to 1,183 households, before the last ballot is cast.

1,183
households on the target list
3,550
dials across three attempts
186
live conversations: persuasion, voter ID, ballot chase

Call list: every ticket splitter and undecided voter in the targeted places (you cannot tell which way they lean before the call), every targeted drop-off voter, and the reachable third-party voters. About 69 households for every 100 voters on the list, three attempts each, and a 5.24 percent live answer rate per attempt, the per-program average across 1.2 million real 2026 dials in our published benchmarks.

HyperPhonebank

We run this list.

Calls are the voter ID and ballot chase engine of this plan. They find the persuadable voters and the supporters, so every other dollar lands on the right door. The full call program for this list is an estimated $793 at our published rates: 1,183 households, three attempts each.

Professional live callers working exactly these precincts: persuasion on the ticket splitters, voter ID on the fence, ballot chase on every absentee request until it is returned. A live dashboard shows every conversation as it happens. Days to launch, not weeks.

The candidates

Who is on the ballot.

Underdog

Steve Manos (R)

Lake Elsinore City Council member since 2012 who has served several one-year terms as mayor, most recently in 2026. A business owner since 1996 in the real estate industry, he is a past president of the Inland Valleys Association of Realtors.

Favorite · incumbent

Mark Takano (D)

U.S. Representative since 2013 and a former public school teacher who taught British literature for 23 years. He was the first openly gay person of Asian descent elected to Congress.

Cash on hand $186,224 and $893,848 raised since January 1, 2025, per FEC reports through June 30, 2026.

Underdog Updates

What changed, and when.

We re-run this race as new polls, fundraising reports and early vote counts arrive. Every change to the numbers is logged here.

  1. September 26, 2026
    Underdog plan published

    Starting line: Takano +9.1. Steve Manos needs 12,369 net votes. Odds 10% today, 12% with the plan.

Share this plan. Running this campaign, or backing it? This page is yours to share with your team and supporters.
Share

Questions

Can Steve Manos win California's 39th Congressional District in 2026?

Only with help from the national environment. Campaign work can move about 742 net votes; the gap is 12,369. The rest would take a 8.5-point national shift.

Where are the votes Steve Manos needs?

Ranked by net votes in the plan: Riverside, Moreno Valley, Jurupa Valley, Perris, Unincorporated Riverside County. Persuadable voters are counted from ticket splitting in 2022 and 2024 official returns; turnout targets are people who voted in 2024 and skipped 2022.

How many voters does Steve Manos need to persuade?

About 236 voters who lean Mark Takano today, each worth two votes of margin when they switch. That is 50 percent of the 472 persuadable voters leaning Mark Takano.

When does early voting start in California in 2026?

California mails every active registered voter a ballot starting October 5, 2026. Ballots postmarked by November 3 count if they arrive by November 10, vote centers open before Election Day, and conditional voter registration is available through Election Day.

Who made this analysis?

The Political Group, an independent campaign services firm, from official California Secretary of State precinct returns, Census data, FEC filings and published polls. It is not affiliated with any candidate or party.

Method and sources

Precinct math from official California Secretary of State returns for 2022 and 2024, projected onto current district lines. Polls, ratings and fundraising as published on the dates shown. This is independent analysis by The Political Group, as of September 26, 2026. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by any candidate or party, and it is written for every campaign that starts behind.

Statistics: a weighted least squares crossover regression on every precinct, and 20,000 seeded Monte Carlo simulations. The baseline error (7 points of margin) and plan efficacy spread (30 percent) are our stated assumptions. Download the precinct data (CSV, ready for JASP). Free to cite under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page.

Race coverage

More California underdogs

CA-01
What it would take for James Gallagher
25,384 net votes to find
CA-02
What it would take for Robin Littau
73,303 net votes to find
CA-03
How Robb Tucker wins
17,447 net votes to find
CA-05
What it would take for Michael Masuda
64,509 net votes to find
CA-08
What it would take for Rudy Recile
77,484 net votes to find
CA-09
What it would take for John McBride
20,892 net votes to find
CA-10
What it would take for Jeff Frese
89,722 net votes to find
CA-13
How Kevin Lincoln wins
909 net votes to find
CA-15
What it would take for Charles Hoelter
110,536 net votes to find
CA-16
What it would take for Peter Sundin Soulé
121,035 net votes to find
CA-17
What it would take for Ritesh Tandon
74,335 net votes to find
CA-18
What it would take for Shane Lewis
45,623 net votes to find
CA-19
What it would take for Peter Coe Verbica
94,345 net votes to find
CA-20
What it would take for Sandra Van Scotter
79,673 net votes to find
CA-21
How Kyle Kirkland wins
6,694 net votes to find
CA-22
How David G. Valadao wins
2,091 net votes to find
CA-23
What it would take for Tessa Lynn Hodge
39,030 net votes to find
CA-24
What it would take for Bob Smith
57,623 net votes to find
CA-25
What it would take for Joe Males
11,221 net votes to find
CA-26
What it would take for Sam Gallucci
29,689 net votes to find
CA-27
What it would take for Jason Gibbs
14,869 net votes to find
CA-28
What it would take for April A. Verlato
55,588 net votes to find
CA-30
What it would take for Scott Alan Meyers
108,602 net votes to find
CA-31
What it would take for Eric Ching
18,354 net votes to find
CA-32
What it would take for Larry Thompson
64,067 net votes to find
CA-33
What it would take for Stephanie M. Vargas
13,679 net votes to find
CA-35
What it would take for Mike Cargile
10,568 net votes to find
CA-36
What it would take for Houston Brignano
104,867 net votes to find
CA-38
What it would take for Pedro Antonio Casas
15,263 net votes to find
CA-41
What it would take for Mitch Clemmons
22,602 net votes to find
CA-42
What it would take for Brian Burley
22,512 net votes to find
CA-43
What it would take for Cristian Morales
65,485 net votes to find
CA-44
What it would take for Genevieve Angel
46,074 net votes to find
CA-45
How Chuong V. Vo wins
4,669 net votes to find
CA-46
What it would take for David Pan
21,132 net votes to find
CA-47
What it would take for Jenny Rae Le Roux
17,609 net votes to find
CA-48
How Jim Desmond wins
6,322 net votes to find
CA-49
What it would take for Armen Kurdian
22,576 net votes to find
CA-50
What it would take for Steve Cohen
38,527 net votes to find
CA-51
What it would take for Ricardo Cabrera
41,238 net votes to find
CA-52
What it would take for Jeff Belle
29,221 net votes to find